Genocide: A Crime with Intent to Destroy in Whole or in Part

Authors

  • Md. Hasnath Kabir Fahim Department of Legal Studies, University of Bologna, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58829/lp.10.1.2023.1-13

Keywords:

Genocide, Genocidal Intent, ICC Statute, Mens Rea, Holocaust

Abstract

Abstract. Like all other crimes, genocide has some common elements such as an actus reus and a corresponding mens rea. Moreover, another subjective element is also present in all crimes of genocide which is the “intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a […] group as such.” This is also referred to as “genocidal intent” and it indicates that the criminal liability of genocide does not merely rely on the completed result of the committed act but depends on the intention of the perpetrator to achieve. However, the threshold of this intention is not as high as the mens rea narrated in Article 30 of the ICC Statute. In addition, there is no requirement for the existence of any special extent of this intention. Indeed, Dolus eventualis is adequate to perform the actus reus as well as to establish the particular “intent to destroy […].” The theoretical criterion of The Draft Elements of Crimes is both inadmissible and unadvisable for limiting the criminal liability of genocide or the authority of the Court for trying such crimes

Keywords: Genocide, Genocidal Intent, ICC Statute, Mens Rea, Holocaust

Abstrak. Seperti semua kejahatan lainnya, genosida memiliki beberapa elemen umum seperti actus reus dan mens rea yang sesuai. Selain itu, unsur subyektif lainnya juga hadir dalam semua kejahatan genosida yaitu “niat untuk menghancurkan, seluruhnya atau sebagian, suatu […] kelompok itu sendiri.” Ini juga disebut sebagai “niat genosida” dan ini menunjukkan bahwa pertanggungjawaban pidana genosida tidak hanya bergantung pada hasil akhir dari tindakan yang dilakukan tetapi tergantung pada niat pelaku untuk mencapainya. Namun ambang batas niat ini tidak setinggi mens rea yang diriwayatkan dalam Pasal 30 Statuta ICC. Selain itu, tidak ada persyaratan untuk adanya tingkat khusus dari niat ini. Memang, Dolus eventualis cukup untuk melakukan actus reus serta untuk menetapkan niat untuk menghancurkan [...]” tertentu. Kriteria teoretis dari Rancangan Elemen Kejahatan tidak dapat diterima dan tidak disarankan untuk membatasi pertanggungjawaban pidana genosida atau otoritas Pengadilan untuk mengadili kejahatan semacam itu

Kata kunci: Genosida, Niat Genosida, Statuta ICC, Mens Rea, Holocaust

References

Akhavan, Payam. “The crime of genocide in the ICTR jurisprudence.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 3, no. 4 (2005): 989-1006.

Akhavan, Payam. Reducing Genocide to Law: definition, meaning, and the ultimate crime. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Aksar, Yusuf. “The Specific Intent (Dolus Specialis) Requirement of the Crime of Genocide: Confluence or Conflict between the Practice of Ad Hoc Tribunals and the ICJ.” International Relations/Uluslararasi Iliskiler 6, no. 23 (2009): 113-126.

Alamuddin, Amal, and Philippa Webb. “Expanding jurisdiction over war crimes under Article 8 of the ICC Statute.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 8, no. 5 (2010): 1219-1243.

Alonzo-Maizlish, David. “In Whole or in Part: Group Rights, the Intent Element of Genocide, and the Quantitative Criterion.” New York University Law Review 77 (2002): 1369-1403.

Ambos, Kai. “What does ‘intent to destroy’ in genocide mean?.” International Review of the Red Cross 91, no. 876 (2009): 833-858.

Aptel, Cecile. “The intent to commit genocide in the case law of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.” In Criminal Law Forum, 13, no. 3 (2002): 273-291.

Arnold, Roberta. “The Mens Rea of Genocide under the Statute of the International Criminal Court.” Criminal Law Forum 14, no. 2 (2003): 127-151.

Aydin, Devrim. “The interpretation of genocidal intent under the genocide convention and the jurisprudence of international courts.” The Journal of Criminal Law 78, no. 5 (2014): 423-441.

Ayvazyan, Vahram. “Genocide: intent, motivation and types.” Suvremene teme: međunarodni časopis za društvene i humanističke znanosti 5, no. 1 (2012): 21-36.

Cheh, Mary M. “Constitutional Limits on Using Civil Remedies to Achieve Criminal Law Objectives: Understanding and Transcending the Criminal-Civil Law Distinction.” Hastings Law Journal 42, no. 5 (1991): 1325-1413.

Clark, Janine Natalya. “Elucidating the Dolus Specialis: An analysis of ICTY jurisprudence on genocidal intent.” Criminal Law Forum 26, no. 3-4 (2015): 497-531.

Cohen, Meir Dan. “The “Actus Reus” and Offences of “Situation”.” Israel Law Review 7, no. 2 (1972): 186-194.

Costa, Pietro, and Danilo Zolo, ed. “The Rule of Law History: Theory and Criticism”. Berlin: Springer Dordrecht, 2007.

Elewabadar, Mohamed. “Mens rea–Mistake of Law & Mistake of Fact in German Criminal Law: A Survey for International Criminal Tribunals.” International Criminal Law Review 5, no. 2 (2005): 203-246.

Fahim, Md Hasnath Kabir. “Rethinking Genocidal Intent: An Interpretation under the International Law and the Jurisprudence of International Criminal Tribunals.” Lex Publica 9, no. 1 (2022): 58-78.

Frulli, Micaela. “Are crimes against humanity more serious than war crimes?.” European Journal of International Law 12, no. 2 (2001): 329-350.

Gaeta, Paola. The UN Genocide Convention: A Commentary. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Goldsmith, Katherine. “The Issue of Intent in the Genocide Convention and Its Effect on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide: Toward a Knowledge-Based Approach.” Genocide Studies and Prevention 5, no. 3 (2010): 238-257.

Greenawalt, Alexander KA. “Rethinking genocidal intent: the case for a knowledge-based interpretation.” Columbia Law Review 99, no. 8 (1999): 2259-2294.

Greenfield, Daniel M. “The Crime of Complicity in Genocide: How the International Criminal Tribunals for Rwanda and Yugoslavia Got It Wrong, and Why It Matters.” The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 98, no. 3 (2008): 921-952.

Hamann, Brigitte. Hitler’s Vienna: a dictator’s apprenticeship. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Kallis, Aristotle. Genocide and fascism: The eliminationist drive in fascist Europe. New York: Routledge, 2008.

Kimball, Lee. “The seventh session of the preparatory commission for the 1982 UN convention on the law of the sea.” Kingston, Jamaica, 27 February–23 March 1989, and UN Headquarters, New York, USA, 14 August–1 September 1989. Marine Policy, 1990, 14.1: 88-93.

Kreß, Claus. “The crime of genocide under international law.” International Criminal Law Review 6, no. 4 (2006): 461-502.

LeBlanc, Lawrence J. “The intent to destroy groups in the Genocide Convention: the proposed US Understanding.” American Journal of International Law 78, no. 2 (1984): 369-385.

Marcus, Joshua. “Intent to Destroy.” Undergraduate Transitional Justice Review 3, no. 1 (2012): 5-17.

May, Larry. “State Aggression, Collective Liability, and Individual Mens Rea.” Midwest Studies In Philosophy 30, no. 1 (2006): 309-324.

Oliner, Samuel P., and Pearl M. Oliner. Altruistic personality: rescuers of Jews in Nazi Europe. New York: The Free Press, 1988.

Schabas, William A. “The Jelisić case and the mens rea of the crime of genocide.” Leiden Journal of International Law 14, no. 1 (2001): 125-139.

Starr, Sonja, and Lea Brilmayer. “Family separation as a violation of international law.” Berkeley Journal of International Law 21, (2003): 213-287.

Staub, Ervin. The roots of evil: The origins of genocide and other group violence. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Stone, Dan. “Raphael Lemkin on the Holocaust.” In The Origins of Genocide, edited by Dominik J. Schaller and Jürgen Zimmerer, 95-106. London: Routledge, 2013.

Tomz, Michael. “Domestic audience costs in international relations: An experimental approach.” International Organization 61, no. 4 (2007): 821-840.

Triffterer, Otto. “Genocide, its particular intent to destroy in whole or in part the group as such.” Leiden Journal of International Law 14, no. 2 (2001): 399-408.

Verdirame, Guglielmo. “The Genocide Definition in the Jurisprudence of the ad hoc Tribunals.” International & Comparative Law Quarterly 49, no. 3 (2000): 578-598.

Weinberg, Gerhard L. “Munich after 50 years.” In World War Two, edited by Lily Xiao Hong Lee, 15-28. New York: Routledge, 2016.

Werle, Gerhard, and Florian Jessberger. “‘Unless otherwise provided’: Article 30 of the ICC statute and the mental element of crimes under international criminal law.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 3, no. 1 (2005): 35-55.

Williams, Timothy, and Dominik Pfeiffer. “Unpacking the Mind of Evil: A Sociological Perspective on the Role of Intent and Motivations in Genocide.” Genocide Studies & Prevention 11, no. 2 (2017): 72-87.

Wilson, Richard Ashby. “Judging history: The historical record of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.” Human Rights Quarterly 27, no. 3 (2005): 908-942.

Wouters, Jan, and Sten Verhoeven. “The domestic prosecution of genocide.” In Elements of Genocide, edited by Paul Behrens and Ralph Henham, 177-206. London: Routledge, 2013.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Kabir Fahim, M. H. (2023). Genocide: A Crime with Intent to Destroy in Whole or in Part. Lex Publica, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.58829/lp.10.1.2023.1-13

Issue

Section

Articles